🔗 Share this article Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Graves Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones. A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations. A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed. “Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.” Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Troubled by the Past One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard. “You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.” “I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.” A Soldier's Grave in Peril Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved. “It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.” In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.” Searching for Answers and Certainty An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious. Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching. “It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.” He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.” “Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.” The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.