🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume nuclear negotiations with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy produced results, and shared fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Course

Araghchi is navigating a challenging path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader asserting the sites had been destroyed. Following this, European countries used their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in various formats if discussions reopen.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Position

In his speech to the conference, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He asserted the assaults commenced with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Solution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the European states that had consistently tried to impose their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary answer to address disputes, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a reply in the equivalent language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to break. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."